Post by Stephanie Carter, Attorney at Law, with Draneas & Huglin, P.C.
Member, Senior Resource Alliance Northwest

Copper mining heiress and youngest daughter of former U.S. Senator and industrialist William A. Clark, Huguette Clark, died in May 2011 at the age of 104. She left behind an estate totalling approximately $400 million.
Clark’s last will and testament was filed with the court in June 2011. The will was made in 2005 and left 75% of her estate, about $300 million, to charity. Her longtime nurse, Hadassah Peri, received about $30 million, her goddaughter, Wanda Styka, received about $12 million, and the newly created Bellosguardo Foundation received $8 million (a charitable foundation overseen by her accountant, Irving Kamsler, and her attorney, Wallace Bock). Other employees who managed her residences received smaller sums. Her attorney and accountant each received a bequest of $500,000.
Clark’s family has filed court documents indicating there was a different will, dated six weeks earlier, which leaves most of her estate to her family. The documents alleged that Kamsler and Bock systematically manipulated and exploited Clark, isolating her from her family, and taking away her free will. These allegations are the basis for a potential elder abuse and undue influence suit. Apparently, questions about Kamsler and Bock’s management of Clark’s fortune were raised in a 2010 series of investigative reports on MSNBC. As a result, both men were placed under investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office.
Recent investigations by the Manhattan public administrator indicate that Kamsler and Bock, who were paid thousands of dollars a month for responsibilities that included dealing with Clark’s taxes, had let $90 million in unpaid federal gift taxes and penalties accrue by December 2011. Amid rumors that the public administrator was about to request the court to remove Kamsler and Bock as executors of the estate, Kamsler resigned.
Clark’s case raises several issues that seniors should be aware of as they plan for management of their affairs in the event of incapacity and the distribution of their estate after their death.
Normally a person in Clark’s situation would have established a revocable living trust and all of her assets would have been held by the trust and managed by one or more trustees.
The trustee(s) would have been subject to fiduciary duties, their actiions could be reviewed by the court at the request of an interested person, and the trustee fees would likely have been limited to a “reasonable fee.” A trust would also have avoided probate, kept the details of Clark’s estate private, and facilitated the transfer of assets to the beneficiaries.
Such an estate plan may have avoided the potential for elder abuse that is alleged in this case. Under Oregon law, a person can designate a “Trust Protector” who receives annual accountings and reports on the trust and may have the power to remove and replace a trustee. This is another safeguard.
There are also ethical issues with regard to attorney Bock receiving a bequest from Clark, particularly if he prepared the will.
Sources: Reuters, “Family of reclusive U.S. copper heiress disputes will,” Chris Francescani, November 29, 011. Associated Press, “Taxes questioned, accountant quits on heiress’s estate.”
Stephanie Carter, Attorney at Law, Draneas & Huglin, P.C., 4004 Kruse Way Place, Suite 200,
Lake Oswego, OR, (503) 496-5509, stephanie@draneaslaw.com
…